Civic Commons

Sharing technology for the public good

"We saw an opportunity to take an experiment done in Philadelphia and apply it in Denver ahead of our summer hackathon to generate a test case for simple engagement methods and generate a large amount of data. In partnership with OpenPlans, we are proud to announce Denver’s Beautiful Streets."

Introducing Denver’s Beautiful Streets

Congrats to PlaceMatters and OpenPlans on a successful and promising redeployment of Beautiful Streets, a civic app aimed at generating crowdsourced data about the urban environment. 

According to the organizers, there are some very easy instructions to set it up in Heroku, which should help any others interested in redeploying the app. Any takers?

(via codeforamerica)

(via codeforamerica)

"If I show up at city hall and start saying, ‘Hey there, can you give me your data?’ people usually get defensive and assume it is for some sort of ‘gotcha’ project or story,” says Mertens. “But when you show them that local developers can build in a weekend what it would take a city months or years, they start to loosen up. Using public art data is a nice gateway drug — its innocuous, it doesn’t involve crime or children."
"We also are working with Code for America (CFA) to partner with the City on an accelerator for startups that focus on civic issues, funded by Google and the Kauffman Foundation. CFA will also provide a platform for civic hackers to maintain and adapt open source code for the city, establish a fellowship assigning three bright minds to city government for a year to solve specific problems, and create a Civic Commons Marketplace for cities to share technology and collaborate on new technologies and applications."
"Why should every city government treat the same issues as unique barriers? If one has pushed through a solution, why would we try to face the issue as a barrier? If we change our mode of thinking we are now viewing this issue simply as a process to follow. I’m not trying to simplify complex scenarios nor to undervalue thoughtful planning, but I don’t see how we can view the same problems as unique, over and over again. Take the hard work others have done before us, leverage it for our city and residents benefit, and do the same with out struggles and wins- publish our process successes and our common software solutions and share in the efficiencies and collaborations that can strengthen our governments and improve their operation.

To wit, this is exactly how I’m approaching our efforts to implement opendata in both the City of Oakland and the County of Alameda. San Francisco, New York and Chicago have done the hard work blazing a trail, now we have a great process to follow so we don’t have to do the same hard work as they did.

* Identify problem
* Search for existing solution
* Plug and play.

And I think that the more we talk about the processes and struggles to change, the more we all gain."

Steve Spiker: Barriers or Processes?

 Steve Spiker writes a great post about the potential to open-source our processes, not just our code.  Hear hear.

Open Architecture [i.e., The Internet Is a Human Right]

continuations:

The Internet is not really a technology but rather a set of principles that have become embodied in a bunch of different technologies.  I am going to quote at some length from a document that Cerf also co-authored about the history of the Internet:

The Internet as we now know it embodies a key underlying technical idea, namely that of open architecture networking. In this approach, the choice of any individual network technology was not dictated by a particular network architecture but rather could be selected freely by a provider and made to interwork with the other networks through a meta-level “Internetworking Architecture”

Albert Wenger discusses how the Open Architecture of the internet contributes fundamental rights and freedoms that it offers.

When we talk about “Government as a Platform”, we’re largely drawing a parallel between the architecture of government technology (and cities, more broadly) and the architecture of the Internet.  The idea, described above, that an open architecture is not about any one technology, but rather about a set of principles that can be embodied by different technologies, is the key.  By building around an open architecture, guided by open standards, new specific technologies can be inserted, replaced, and improved as necessary, without disrupting the overall structure.  The freedom that this architecture embodies explicitly encourages innovation, by decreasing the cost of changing or improving any one component, or of adding something new on top of the system.

This all sounds a bit abstract, I’m sure, so for our part at Civic Commons, we’ll work on tying these concepts into more concrete examples.

"Increasingly, citizens are demanding access to raw data from governments to hold public officials accountable, look up facts, conduct analysis, or create innovative applications and services. Cities and towns create data using geographic information systems such as layers describing parcels, zoning, and infrastructure that are useful for a wide range of purposes. Through a public records request to all 351 Massachusetts municipalities, this paper investigates whether these data are accessible to citizens in practice. Some response was received by 78.6 percent of the municipalities. Two municipalities refused access to all electronic records. Many others charged fees ranging up to $453 or placed legal restrictions on the data through licensing that could chill or prohibit creative reuses of the information through emerging technologies. Other practical barriers limited public access to data, such as limited resources, government officials’ limited technical knowledge, and outsourcing to private vendors. A followup survey among municipalities that did not respond to the request was conducted to determine if they had GIS systems or data policies, and this information was collected for 80.3 percent of the municipalities. Finally, the paper discusses the legal, policy, and technical steps that can be taken by governments to move from a “public records” to an “open government” paradigm for transparency of government data. The policy recommendations for municipalities include publishing GIS data for free online and with minimal legal restrictions."

Goodspeed Update » Blog Archive » How Open are Massachusetts Municipal Data?

This is really great.  Rob Goodspeed’s research into the state of open data in MA, from a really practical perspective.  Here’s the link to the full paper.

(via theslowhunch)

(via )

"Mike Reich, president of Seabourne consulting, wrote on his blog on Dec. 22 that his company helped to create MyFCC. He said the new platform was relatively inexpensive to create because it leverages the open-source content available at the main Web portal FCC.gov “Because we were able to leverage the FCC.gov content through the API, the time and cost to develop MyFCC were radically lower than alternative approaches. This is a great example of how a Web API Platform architecture can help reduce development cost while supporting cutting-edge applications,” Reich wrote."

New website MyFCC lets users design their own dashboard with FCC data, news — Federal Computer Week

Great example of FCC “eating its own dogfood” — consuming its own APIs for the new My.FCC.gov.

Page 1